←back to thread

331 points alex_medvedev | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
alex_medvedev ◴[] No.41846637[source]
Hello. I recently developed Pumpkin, Its a efficent and fast Minecraft server completely written in Rust from the ground up, Check it out :D
replies(2): >>41848101 #>>41848102 #
lesuorac ◴[] No.41848101[source]
> What Pumpkin will not

> Be a drop-in replacement for vanilla or other servers

It seems to me that unless it's a drop-in replacement its not a Minecraft server? Akin to how say an Uno deck isn't a drop-in replacement for a Hearts deck but still both card games but not both Uno decks.

Or is it just meaning that Pumpkin (besides the network) do things differently than vanilla and so you might not be able to open a vanilla created world using Pumpkin?

replies(3): >>41848586 #>>41850403 #>>41851119 #
looperhacks ◴[] No.41848586[source]
The common problem with Minecraft server implementations is that they are not bug-for-bug compatible, which will lead to certain techniques (especially redstone contraptions) breaking. The technical Minecraft community depends on many implementation details which not all servers support
replies(2): >>41849631 #>>41850516 #
Scaevolus ◴[] No.41849631[source]
In addition to the hundreds of blocks and mobs that would need to be implemented properly and rarely are, the lack of mod support is a killer.

The only "complete" reimplementation of Java Minecraft that I'm aware of is Bedrock.

replies(1): >>41849655 #
1. dmonitor ◴[] No.41849655[source]
Far from it. The versions lack a lot of parity and Bedrock is called "bugrock" by the community for a reason
replies(2): >>41849927 #>>41854034 #
2. Scaevolus ◴[] No.41849927[source]
I edited in scare quotes for "complete" to make that clearer, but I mean in terms of at least having matching blocks/mobs despite many differing details.
3. lupusreal ◴[] No.41854034[source]
A lot of the parity issues are due to Bedrock not reimplementing bugs from Java (quasi-connectivity aka "droppers are doors".)