←back to thread

Cargo Airships Are Happening

(www.elidourado.com)
220 points elidourado | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
metalman ◴[] No.41843028[source]
Cargo airships will not happen,in any land based area where wind happens,ie :anywhere this has been hammered flat on numerous aviation engineering forums the only way around the guaranteed ground handling debaucle is to engineer mega structur masts for anchoring,which will need to have a circular pad underneath,where the cargo would have to follow the LTA,as it pivots in the wind so back to a debaucle,with lots of smashing stuff one possibility is airship to ocean ship transfers where wind drift can be managed.....sort of could be made to work for passengers snd small cargo that loads through the central pivot in the mast still the anchoring phase will always be very high risk
replies(3): >>41843582 #>>41844280 #>>41847439 #
frickinLasers ◴[] No.41843582[source]
I'd bet a bunch of former SpaceX engineers will figure out a solution.
replies(2): >>41844305 #>>41845186 #
peterashford ◴[] No.41844305[source]
Yeah, dude was head of Hyperloop. Nailed that one
replies(2): >>41844668 #>>41848928 #
frickinLasers ◴[] No.41844668[source]
I take your point in that there are a lot of naysayers here, as there were with Hyperloop. There were also hundreds of volunteers working on the project, who clearly thought it had a chance of working--and many more saying rockets would never be made reusable, it had been tried before, too many problems that can never be solved...

“Success is stumbling from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm.” - Winston Churchill

replies(5): >>41845542 #>>41846535 #>>41846968 #>>41846982 #>>41848068 #
Wytwwww ◴[] No.41846982{4}[source]
Even if they solve most of the technical issues could this ever be competitive with planes/ships/trucks? Under what circumstances?

It just doesn't seem very practical, basically you'd need to transport freight to places with no access to sea/roads or rails and can't fit it on an airplane. Is there a lot of demand for this? Also presumably such areas would have harsh and unpredictable weather..

> Success is stumbling from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm

Survivor bias? For every case of it working out there are many more of people wasting time and enthusiasm on something that's a dead end (and this was the general consensus for the past 80 years or so)

replies(1): >>41847509 #
usrusr ◴[] No.41847509{5}[source]
Some loads simply don't fit on trucks, or rather on the roads that the trucks have to use. Heavy lift airship would operate in a market segment that does not even exist without them.
replies(1): >>41847614 #
Wytwwww ◴[] No.41847614{6}[source]
> market segment

So I'm just curious what is that segment and how large ($) can it be? What cargo exactly would it be transporting?

replies(2): >>41848639 #>>41867169 #
1. usrusr ◴[] No.41848639{7}[source]
Wind turbine blades is the obvious one. On-shore turbines would be much larger (which btw implies lower rpm, which implies being less annoying) if they were not constrained by land transport.
replies(1): >>41850155 #
2. ◴[] No.41850155[source]