←back to thread

Web Browser Engineering (2021)

(browser.engineering)
679 points MrVandemar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
_benj ◴[] No.41847672[source]
It is so exciting to see material like this being made!

Browsers seem like mysterious, undecipherable black boxes, which is very likely how G wants them to be perceived, but that is cracking by seeing the efforts/results of such projects like ladybird and others!

I hope to one day be able to jump in and contribute to break that moat! And this books looks like an amazing start!

replies(3): >>41847923 #>>41848205 #>>41848511 #
wmanley ◴[] No.41847923[source]
> I hope to one day be able to jump in and contribute to break that moat!

The moat isn't caused by a lack of non-chrome browser engines, it's because so few people use a non-chrome browser engine. Firefox already exists - it's just that ~no-one uses it and for websites that don't work with it those users have learnt to just open up chrome.

I'd love for the moat to be broken, and contributing to a browser engine like ladybird would be fun - but it doesn't contribute to breaking the moat. I'd love to know what would.

replies(2): >>41848055 #>>41848702 #
DavidPiper ◴[] No.41848055[source]
I'm one of those ~nobodies. Firefox is actually quite good these days, I use it at home and at work, 100% of the time - i.e. no Chrome or Safari fallback needed.

If anyone's looking for a reason to try a switch again, consider this your sign.

replies(3): >>41848281 #>>41848498 #>>41850582 #
mattlondon ◴[] No.41848498{3}[source]
Is the performance hit sorted yet when opening a page? For me Firefox used to hang for a second or two doing something? Just a blank screen with the progress bar paused around 20% or so and apparently nothing happening...(DNS? HTTPS handshake?) and then it would kick off and load normally. Happened on mobile(android) and desktop(windows, Linux, macros).

On chrome-based browsers the same pages on the same computers on the same network would load in within the blink of an eye, with no pause.

I eventually gave up and went back to chrome after Firefox being my daily for years. I prefer the dev tools in chrome anyway TBH

replies(2): >>41848609 #>>41855033 #
1. 01HNNWZ0MV43FF ◴[] No.41848609{4}[source]
Sorry to say but I've never seen that bug