Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence

Current final year dental student pitching in here. While dentists of the past may push for unnecessary annual radiographs, the curriculum in dental school has changed to favour evidence-based dentistry. Annual bitewings are only indicated if you're a high caries risk, and, as the article mentions, 2-3 years if you're low caries risk. So your younger/newer dentist will be following much better protocols (and hopefully not scamming you)!

It may start with Radiographs but it certainly doesn't end there.

What is being taught in schools has no relation to reality. Sure, it may somehow influence it, but it won't dictate how each dentist or clinic will work, as they are probably free to and work do almost as they please.

Not too long ago there was a wonderful research story by a journalist of good dental health (as diagnosed by multiple university professors) going across the US for a check up at tens of clinics, and seeing what work will be offered to them.

This journalist has encountered just a few few honest dentists saying no work at all is needed, or something very minor, all the way up to dentists saying he needed work in the tens of thousands of dollars, with the worst offender being in NYC as far as I remember wanting ~$30K for his services.

Unfortunately I can't locate the story right now. If anyone can, please link us.

I didn't yet find the right one, but this one is not too bad either https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2020/0...

Let's just say that it feels like quite a high percentage of dentists don't strictly adhere to the Hippocratic Oath.