←back to thread

234 points benocodes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
1. drastic_fred ◴[] No.41847605[source]
Wow! Less than 200qps per node, quite a redundancy. They also mentioned its read heavy. With aws dynamo db it would be at least 10 times cheaper for their given workload. Although, i do not know how much data they store and serve or how they are additionally (analytics?, etc) using this fleet for.