←back to thread

217 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ethagknight ◴[] No.41842902[source]
To be honest, the autonomous control of the robot seems like the easier part of the equation. (doing it safely in a room with guests, unguided... thats another matter). The physical limitations and packaging are a big challenge, and I dont think I saw Optimus lift anything remotely heavy.. just pull a beer tap.. a decision that probably speaks volumes about current limits of the technology.

To apply my first point to reality: put an Optimus in its current state/capability, on a commercial 0-turn lawn mower, plug Optimus into the mower's power takeoff, and have someone in another country remotely pilot the mower. That right there is worth every commercial lawn service having at least one on their crew TODAY.

The appeal of hot swapping an operator real time on the equipment you already own, whether it's a push lawn mower or a huge mining truck, provides enormous value right out of the gate. Especially in tasks where the Optimus can handle 90% of the task autonomously but needs to step aside or oversight for the last 10% of the job. Compare to a business model that requires purchase of all new very expensive and unique equipment.

replies(4): >>41843438 #>>41843485 #>>41843490 #>>41843507 #
wslh ◴[] No.41843438[source]
> To be honest, the autonomous control of the robot seems like the easier part of the equation.

I agree but it is frustrating watching Elon like Michael Copperfield but thinking it is real like a 4 year old.

I don't see a clear advantage of Tesla against other competitors if he will launch it in a couple of years.

replies(1): >>41844002 #
Philadelphia ◴[] No.41844002[source]
David Copperfield is the magician’s name, if that’s who you meant
replies(1): >>41847435 #
1. wslh ◴[] No.41847435[source]
Yes, my fault! Thanks! David Copperfield, the illusionist.