←back to thread

The Stallman Report

(stallman-report.org)
197 points pkilgore | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
no_time ◴[] No.41846256[source]
The man has weird views on non tech issues. Some are thought provoking, some are plain bad hills to die on. But I don't see how this is something I should be getting up in arms over.

The FSF has largely failed to garner political/public influence to prevent the enshittification of the digital world. What is there to be gained from a putsch like this? If these people truly cared about the mission RMS set out to achieve they would realize that further dividing the minuscule libre software community (which is already co-opted by corporate interests to a large degree) will only get us further away from making a difference in the areas that actually matter.

Like damn, we only narrowly avoided a future where I can't even browse the internet without a TPM attested bootchain deemed "trustworthy" by corporations, and somehow a 71 year old cancer patient is the hottest issue in the tech world right now? Get a fucking grip.

This all just seems like a toxic power grab by people who are blinded by their narcissistic self righteousness.

replies(2): >>41846409 #>>41848441 #
palant ◴[] No.41846409[source]
What is there to be gained you ask? Well, there is currently a creep in a position of power at FSF who is actively making women and other people feel unwelcome, effectively pushing them out of the community. By removing him from this position, making it clear that such behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated, a much broader participation could be achieved. And then these "much bigger" issues you seem to care about have a better chance of being solved.

Unless of course your whole point was using whataboutism to defend your hero, because you think that past achievements always outweigh any harm he may be doing.

replies(1): >>41846578 #
1. no_time ◴[] No.41846578[source]
>Unless of course your whole point was using whataboutism to defend your hero,

No. My point is that replacing him with people who prioritize political grandstanding over fighting for the cause at hand are just as worse if not more.

The people who gave their signature on the previous failed deplatforming attempt were numerous enough to easily fund their own FSF that is not encumbered by the influence by rms. But they didn't. They didn't because that takes actual work unlike spewing vitriol like they do here. They can only destroy but not create.