←back to thread

424 points notamy | 10 comments | | HN request time: 0.827s | source | bottom
1. hettygreen ◴[] No.41845030[source]
This article on hackernews reads the same as "Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Data" would on conkernews.
replies(4): >>41845156 #>>41845620 #>>41848006 #>>41848640 #
2. qwertox ◴[] No.41845156[source]
I'm also pretty disturbed by it being here. Even worse on place #1.
replies(5): >>41845217 #>>41845224 #>>41845225 #>>41846327 #>>41848225 #
3. Sebguer ◴[] No.41845217[source]
I'd recommend finding more important things to be disturbed by.
4. HocusLocus ◴[] No.41845224[source]
Hijacking page on place#1 to post this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rP3AAjsiqY

"Show HN: Two purple Conkers.. and one yellow honker. In Python using PyBangSwackThump With Fleshy Bits"

5. winwang ◴[] No.41845225[source]
#1 does feel a bit much but I don't mind getting a kick out of titles/situations which could be interpreted immaturely.
6. dang ◴[] No.41845620[source]
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
7. vultour ◴[] No.41846327[source]
I'd rather read and learn about conkers than another snake oil AI / crypto blogspam.
8. 1oooqooq ◴[] No.41848006[source]
i also though i was on conckernews. the same colorscheme doesn't help!

i guess HN is out of kleptocoin or infinitesimal LLM overoptimization war stories today and had to find something to plug the top story spot.

9. Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.41848225[source]
It's almost like people upvoted it or it's quiet. Commenting on it won't help; downvote it if you want, upvote things you do want to see.

I for one am here for the random things that pop up on occasion. I have zero interest in LLMs and crypto-bollocks (mainly because I'm not earning money off of it)

10. oytis ◴[] No.41848640[source]
I'm not into AI, so both read approximately the same to me.