←back to thread

217 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
consumer451 ◴[] No.41843901[source]
What does everyone think about 1X's NEO? [0] They began from the idea of compliant robotics,[1] which seems to me to be a requirement for safe operation in proximity to humans.

Did Tesla make attendees sign a hefty liability waiver, since Optimus is not a compliant robot, or did they address the inherent problems some other way?

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUrLuUxv9gE (also remote controlled for now, while being trained)

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb6LMPXRdVc

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_robotics

replies(1): >>41844035 #
modeless ◴[] No.41844035[source]
Each robot had several human escorts, and the robots were limited to slow walking and a few slow hand gestures. The only danger would be if one fell over.

1x NEO looks awesome and far more advanced than this version of Optimus. I'm bullish on 1x. Tesla has a manufacturing advantage though. There were 50 units of Optimus at the event and I expect that there are only a few fully working units of NEO made so far. Also, Optimus has been improving quickly. It's possible Tesla could catch up in a few generations.

replies(3): >>41844090 #>>41844160 #>>41844296 #
mplewis ◴[] No.41844090[source]
A few generations of what, pretending their robots work?
replies(1): >>41844166 #
modeless ◴[] No.41844166[source]
Honestly, I don't know why I bother continuing to engage here. HN community, is this the quality of discourse you want to encourage?
replies(3): >>41844192 #>>41844250 #>>41844570 #
ivewonyoung ◴[] No.41844250{3}[source]
We had people swearing up and down that the Cybertruck would never be released because it was stock fraud. They already seem to be at a run rate of $1.5 billion in revenue per quarter despite launching in a limited fashion because of manufacturing ramp up.
replies(1): >>41844363 #
beeflet ◴[] No.41844363{4}[source]
I haven't really been tracking this, but aren't they selling at a price much greater than they originially announced? I would classify it as "mixed success"
replies(2): >>41844452 #>>41844582 #
1. ivewonyoung ◴[] No.41844582{5}[source]
Whether it'd be a true success remains to be seen, at least in terms of making a profit on total investment. My point was that it certainly wasn't vaporware, even if it didn't sell well.