←back to thread

217 points belter | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.588s | source
Show context
d_silin ◴[] No.41839767[source]
Damn, I am impressed how nonchalantly the flagship NASA mission was using the reused boosters, dirty from soot.
replies(4): >>41840506 #>>41841120 #>>41841936 #>>41844223 #
mmooss ◴[] No.41844223[source]
Agreed. And they said that the (second?) stage was the same one that failed to ignite on a prior mission. How does the NASA administrator sleep at night with everyone's careers, the agency's reputation and funding, the future of planetary bioscience, research by so many scientists, all depending on that stage?

(What's the most valuable payload NASA has lost during launch? Apollo 1 wasn't launching, nor were the space shuttles.)

replies(3): >>41844293 #>>41844373 #>>41845447 #
1. darknavi ◴[] No.41844373[source]
Falcon 9 second stages are not re-usable, so not sure what you mean. Maybe they meant that it's the same model?

As for the first stage boosters, they have a proven reliable record with re-usability.

replies(1): >>41844712 #
2. mmooss ◴[] No.41844712[source]
It was someone with expertise and authority, on the NASA broadcast. I wish I remembered better who or where in the broadcast.