←back to thread

231 points urin | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
whalesalad ◴[] No.41833591[source]
we've come full circle - macromedia dreamweaver had this in 2001
replies(9): >>41833619 #>>41833638 #>>41833664 #>>41833734 #>>41833825 #>>41833849 #>>41833929 #>>41833965 #>>41835472 #
zeroq ◴[] No.41833664[source]
Wait till you hear about Typescript, you know adding types to ECMAScript, like Macromedia did some 20 years ago. :)

Being in the industry for 20+ years and starting as a teenager making games in Flash it makes really hard for me to treat webdev seriously with all their revolutionary innovations.

At work I often encounter a resistance to a tech or solution I propose, because "there hasen't been any substational contribution to the repository in a week, seems dead to me". To which I kindly respond with a question - how do you calculate hypotenuse, because it's been a long time since Pythagoras made the last commit. Meanwhile, some of my friends are still doing side jobs using CakePHP, 20 years later. :)

replies(7): >>41834428 #>>41834556 #>>41834946 #>>41835135 #>>41836926 #>>41837665 #>>41839587 #
asdf000333 ◴[] No.41839587[source]
I'm glad to have mostly avoided frontend dev, but we've also had some bonkers backend trends like SOAP. It was like closing your eyes and wishing for a full-stack impl to appear if you write enough XML.
replies(1): >>41843720 #
zeroq ◴[] No.41843720[source]
Actually, one of the things I miss the most from AS is... E4X.

I work with ton of json, including hundreds of kubernetes definitions per project, and I really miss the ability to parse the data so swiftly and effective with native syntax.

replies(1): >>41843885 #
asdf000333 ◴[] No.41843885[source]
I've never used E4X, but it at least looks like it'd make XML more tolerable.

Most XML experience I had was ejabberd and XMPP. Was thoroughly pissed off by the end of it. We ended up sending JSON over IQ messages instead because we were super done with XML, only to find that iOS's XML parser takes O(N^2) time to parse each element. Had to split the elements to make it work. 0/10 would not recommend.

replies(1): >>41844324 #
1. zeroq ◴[] No.41844324[source]
haha, reminds me of the GTA parser drama :)
replies(1): >>41854250 #
2. asdf000333 ◴[] No.41854250[source]
This? https://nee.lv/2021/02/28/How-I-cut-GTA-Online-loading-times... LOL