←back to thread

217 points belter | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
d_silin ◴[] No.41839767[source]
Damn, I am impressed how nonchalantly the flagship NASA mission was using the reused boosters, dirty from soot.
replies(4): >>41840506 #>>41841120 #>>41841936 #>>41844223 #
mmooss ◴[] No.41844223[source]
Agreed. And they said that the (second?) stage was the same one that failed to ignite on a prior mission. How does the NASA administrator sleep at night with everyone's careers, the agency's reputation and funding, the future of planetary bioscience, research by so many scientists, all depending on that stage?

(What's the most valuable payload NASA has lost during launch? Apollo 1 wasn't launching, nor were the space shuttles.)

replies(3): >>41844293 #>>41844373 #>>41845447 #
1. oceanplexian ◴[] No.41844293[source]
A used booster is probably more reliable than a new one. I know aircraft engines have a bathtub curve, perhaps reusable rockets work the same way.