←back to thread

217 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
quantified ◴[] No.41842362[source]
Surprising absolutely no one, I hope. Credibility seems difficult to generate for Tesla events. Maybe the secret sauce for Robotaxis is a human driver somewhere watching the cameras. Like driving Uber but from the comfort of home, and it's easy to hit the fridge or bathroom between rides.
replies(6): >>41842852 #>>41843217 #>>41843571 #>>41843760 #>>41844492 #>>41844573 #
mandevil ◴[] No.41842852[source]
I mean, you definitely need people available to intervene even for a L4 or L5 autonomy, because they will get stuck (Tesla is not serious about robotaxis until they start staffing up a team to do that on a full-time basis). But actual driving? This link is way too high latency for that to be safe. The robot needs to be maintaining its own SA, and just calling the human when it doesn't know what to do.
replies(1): >>41843617 #
stackghost ◴[] No.41843617[source]
It's amazing to me just how far people will move the goalposts for Elon's perpetual grift.

We've gone from "you'll be able to nap on your morning commute in your self driving car within 18 months" to "they will always need a human to intervene".

Incredible

replies(3): >>41843650 #>>41843991 #>>41844060 #
dullcrisp ◴[] No.41843650[source]
I don’t think the person you’re replying to said anything about Elon Musk in this case
replies(1): >>41843810 #
1. stackghost ◴[] No.41843810[source]
Not directly, but he and Tesla are unfortunately inextricably linked.