←back to thread

303 points FigurativeVoid | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.192s | source
Show context
jayd16 ◴[] No.41842070[source]
Hmm, are there better cases that disprove JTB? Couldn't one argue that the reliance on a view that can't tell papermache from a cow is simply not a justified belief?

Is the crux of the argument that justification is an arbitrary line and ultimately insufficient?

replies(3): >>41842221 #>>41842231 #>>41842286 #
1. abeppu ◴[] No.41842286[source]
I like the example of seeing a clock as you walk past. It says it's 2:30. You believe that the time is 2:30. That seems like a perfectly reasonable level of justification -- you looked at a clock and read the time. If unbeknownst to you, that clock is broken and stuck at 2:30, but you also just happened to walk by and read it at 2:30, then do you "know" that it's 2:30?

I think a case can't so much "disprove" JTB, so much as illustrate that adopting a definition of knowledge is more complex than you might naively believe.