←back to thread

How I Experience Web Today (2021)

(how-i-experience-web-today.com)
450 points airstrike | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.808s | source
Show context
anyfoo ◴[] No.41841184[source]
What I always don't understand is: So you don't want to pay for online content, but you also want to use an ad blocker. In summary, you don't want the author or creator to get paid?

Personally, I hate ads, so I pay. I have digital subscriptions to the newspapers I read. I have YouTube Premium (because I spend an ungodly amount of time on that site).

But for people who want to do neither... what's your idea?

replies(6): >>41841237 #>>41841846 #>>41842369 #>>41842977 #>>41843206 #>>41843740 #
hosh ◴[] No.41841237[source]
There is a whole lot more to this than just whether content creators or publishes should get paid, and whether there should be ad blockers (and whether they get paid).

There are people who have been fed up by this because they remembered how the web was like in the late 90s, before social media pushes became the dominant experience. People have formulated ideas around the Small Web (https://benhoyt.com/writings/the-small-web-is-beautiful/), or even opted out of the browser ecosystem entirely with Gemini (https://geminiprotocol.net/) or keep the torch burning for Gopher (https://hackaday.com/2021/09/28/gopher-the-competing-standar...)

From there, it is also a short hop and skip away to folks working on local-first (https://localfirstweb.dev/), decentralization, collapse computing (https://100r.co/site/philosophy.html and http://collapseos.org/)

replies(2): >>41841771 #>>41871268 #
anyfoo ◴[] No.41841771[source]
I get that, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about people whose job content is, and who may have had the same job in the 90s, e.g. newspaper journalists.

So I'm asking those who don't want to pay for a subscription, but want to use an ad blocker: How does it work?

As said, I opted for paying the creator directly, because I hate the ad ecosystem. Seems like a lot of people want to do neither, but still expect their content to magically exist.

replies(5): >>41842125 #>>41842192 #>>41843411 #>>41843585 #>>41846751 #
1. n_plus_1_acc ◴[] No.41842125[source]
Many of my favourite blogs are ad-free. The people behindert it just do it with passion and don't expect anything in return. This is in contrast to nrwspapets and magazines, which just pump out clickbait shit while bring full of ads and tracking. Another option is the patreon/twitch model, where people Sonate money to creators.
replies(1): >>41842731 #
2. ravenstine ◴[] No.41842731[source]
Yes, the irony I have seen with written content is, with the exception being books, most paid written content is still crap.
replies(1): >>41851386 #
3. hosh ◴[] No.41851386[source]
At some point, you stop selling content, and you start selling an audience with a known demographic to advertisers.

In such a market, the business is disincentivized to produce thoughtful content, and need to churn the bait the draw in the audience. So it isn't as if creators are being compensated for creating, and instead content producers are compensated for producing words that will lure in readers.