←back to thread

231 points urin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
whalesalad ◴[] No.41833591[source]
we've come full circle - macromedia dreamweaver had this in 2001
replies(9): >>41833619 #>>41833638 #>>41833664 #>>41833734 #>>41833825 #>>41833849 #>>41833929 #>>41833965 #>>41835472 #
zeroq ◴[] No.41833664[source]
Wait till you hear about Typescript, you know adding types to ECMAScript, like Macromedia did some 20 years ago. :)

Being in the industry for 20+ years and starting as a teenager making games in Flash it makes really hard for me to treat webdev seriously with all their revolutionary innovations.

At work I often encounter a resistance to a tech or solution I propose, because "there hasen't been any substational contribution to the repository in a week, seems dead to me". To which I kindly respond with a question - how do you calculate hypotenuse, because it's been a long time since Pythagoras made the last commit. Meanwhile, some of my friends are still doing side jobs using CakePHP, 20 years later. :)

replies(7): >>41834428 #>>41834556 #>>41834946 #>>41835135 #>>41836926 #>>41837665 #>>41839587 #
almostgotcaught ◴[] No.41834428[source]
> how do you calculate hypotenuse, because it's been a long time since Pythagoras made the last commit.

Asinine - everything advances and needs maintenance over time, even geometry. I invite you to try building a game without using quaternions or projective (ie non-euclidean) geometry.

Edit: does hn award points based on contrariness? Or is it just that people on hn think they're super clever with their contrary point?

replies(3): >>41834595 #>>41834726 #>>41836540 #
defrost ◴[] No.41834595{3}[source]
quaternions - 1843, Hamilton

projective geometry - 1420's but big in the 19th Century.

These are things I used heavily programming earth mapping systems in the mid 1980s to mid 1990s. Principal reference text was from the 1920s.

replies(1): >>41834614 #
almostgotcaught ◴[] No.41834614{4}[source]
... The guy I responded to is saying Pythagoras is good enough. Do you know what year Pythagoras died?
replies(2): >>41834720 #>>41842063 #
1. malfmalf ◴[] No.41842063{5}[source]
495 BC. And his Theorem is still good enough for most practical purposes, so his point stands