←back to thread

162 points lr0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.22s | source
Show context
RamiAwar ◴[] No.41834309[source]
I would convert, but price is too high for me personally.

I'd be willing to pay up to 3$ a month for my searches, but also per-use.

If I make 0 searches, why do I need to pay?

A replacement for Google that is to survive should really convince and be super cheap, it's so easy to ignore sponsored search results (for now).

replies(5): >>41834337 #>>41834365 #>>41834419 #>>41834423 #>>41834490 #
PlattypusRex[dead post] ◴[] No.41834419[source]
[flagged]
ajkjk ◴[] No.41834425[source]
Well yes but it's kinda crappy that you do. Can easily imagine an alternate reality where laws are more pro-consumer such that it's illegal to charge someone for a service in a month that they don't use it.
replies(1): >>41834492 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.41834492[source]
> Can easily imagine an alternate reality where laws are more pro-consumer such that it's illegal to charge someone for a service in a month that they don't use it

Didn't use my vacation home this month, skipping the mortgage payments!

replies(2): >>41836819 #>>41839448 #
1. ajkjk ◴[] No.41839448[source]
That's not at all the same.