←back to thread

353 points tahnok | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.402s | source
Show context
Galanwe ◴[] No.41834576[source]
Is there a similar ring with NFC?

I have no use for the smart health thingies, which really look like a data driven health gimmicks to me.

NFC on the other hand I could find hundreds of applications, from payment to access and transport cards.

replies(7): >>41834612 #>>41834668 #>>41834697 #>>41834767 #>>41835177 #>>41838600 #>>41907420 #
edent ◴[] No.41834767[source]
Yes. I have the Z1 Ring.

Getting secure tokens (like payment, door unlock, etc) is possible but can be complicated. The ring is a small target, so not always easy to find the received if you're using it with a phone.

Oh, and the software is low level and finickity. I managed to accidentally set mine to read only mode permanently.

Review at https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2024/02/giving-the-finger-to-mfa-a-...

replies(1): >>41836120 #
stavros ◴[] No.41836120[source]
I have a suspicion this is a whitelabeled NFC ring I got from AliExpress for $12. That one includes a T5577 chip and a Mifare tag. You can read and write the Mifare tag with your phone, as normal, and the T5577 with a Flipper Zero or a Proxmark (also from Ali, $40).

The NFC tag is a small target, probably because of the size of the antenna, but the RFID one has pretty good range. I got five of those rings, very much recommended if you have stuff to auth to.

replies(1): >>41837089 #
edent ◴[] No.41837089[source]
I think your suspicions are wrong. Those $12 rings will allow you to serve NDEF messages or similar. They won't do U2F, payment, car unlock etc.
replies(1): >>41837133 #
stavros ◴[] No.41837133[source]
It doesn't look like the Z1 does payment either, though. I don't know how they do U2F, but it looks like it comes with a custom reader, which is non-standard. I don't know how Tesla unlock works, so I can't say there.
replies(1): >>41838411 #
1. edent ◴[] No.41838411[source]
There is no custom reader. It works with standard NFC readers on Linux and Android.
replies(1): >>41838505 #
2. stavros ◴[] No.41838505[source]
Ahh interesting, thank you.