←back to thread

231 points urin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
whalesalad ◴[] No.41833591[source]
we've come full circle - macromedia dreamweaver had this in 2001
replies(9): >>41833619 #>>41833638 #>>41833664 #>>41833734 #>>41833825 #>>41833849 #>>41833929 #>>41833965 #>>41835472 #
zeroq ◴[] No.41833664[source]
Wait till you hear about Typescript, you know adding types to ECMAScript, like Macromedia did some 20 years ago. :)

Being in the industry for 20+ years and starting as a teenager making games in Flash it makes really hard for me to treat webdev seriously with all their revolutionary innovations.

At work I often encounter a resistance to a tech or solution I propose, because "there hasen't been any substational contribution to the repository in a week, seems dead to me". To which I kindly respond with a question - how do you calculate hypotenuse, because it's been a long time since Pythagoras made the last commit. Meanwhile, some of my friends are still doing side jobs using CakePHP, 20 years later. :)

replies(7): >>41834428 #>>41834556 #>>41834946 #>>41835135 #>>41836926 #>>41837665 #>>41839587 #
almostgotcaught ◴[] No.41834428[source]
> how do you calculate hypotenuse, because it's been a long time since Pythagoras made the last commit.

Asinine - everything advances and needs maintenance over time, even geometry. I invite you to try building a game without using quaternions or projective (ie non-euclidean) geometry.

Edit: does hn award points based on contrariness? Or is it just that people on hn think they're super clever with their contrary point?

replies(3): >>41834595 #>>41834726 #>>41836540 #
defrost ◴[] No.41834595[source]
quaternions - 1843, Hamilton

projective geometry - 1420's but big in the 19th Century.

These are things I used heavily programming earth mapping systems in the mid 1980s to mid 1990s. Principal reference text was from the 1920s.

replies(1): >>41834614 #
almostgotcaught ◴[] No.41834614{3}[source]
... The guy I responded to is saying Pythagoras is good enough. Do you know what year Pythagoras died?
replies(2): >>41834720 #>>41842063 #
defrost ◴[] No.41834720{4}[source]
Does that invalidate his theorem (that he cribbed from the Babylonians)?
replies(1): >>41836623 #
IAmGraydon ◴[] No.41836623{5}[source]
No one said it invalidated his theorem. They said it has been expanded upon.

Also, comparing web technologies to something as fundamental as the pythagorean theorem is reductionist and overall pretty ridiculous. Web technologies need maintenance. Proven mathematical formulas don’t.

replies(1): >>41837395 #
1. defrost ◴[] No.41837395{6}[source]
They actually asked if I was aware what year he died.

The eponymous triangle work is just as valid as it ever was in Euclidean geometries - lot of work there. That work is just as wrong as it ever was in non-Euclidean geometries - maths is timeless like that.

> Also, comparing web technologies to something as fundamental as ...

Take that up with whomever it was that did that.