←back to thread

162 points lr0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
oefrha ◴[] No.41834417[source]
A point I hardly ever see anyone bring up: I’m not a fan of the idea of doing all my searches while signed in, potentially creating a company-knows-me-better-than-myself situation. I do my searches in private windows mostly behind commercial VPNs so that it’s difficult enough to profile me that companies probably won’t bother. Public search engines have to get really bad before I move to a sign-in-required one.

But given that this community which ostensibly touts privacy at every turn seems to overwhelmingly support feeding everything (not just searches) into OpenAI/Claude, I guess my aversion to having all my searches rounded up by a company (even if it’s not Google) is very fringe.

Btw I’m by no means a privacy maximalist.

replies(5): >>41834530 #>>41834654 #>>41835562 #>>41836139 #>>41836273 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.41834530[source]
> my aversion to having all my searches rounded up by a company (even if it’s not Google) is very fringe

Kagi provides strong privacy guarantees [1]. They could be lying. But so could your VPN providers.

[1] https://kagi.com/privacy

replies(2): >>41834630 #>>41835338 #
whilenot-dev ◴[] No.41834630[source]
I'm calling marketing fluff here, given that its founder seems to hold a skewed model of kagis power in regard to collecting personal information altogether: "personal information is what you can be identified with as an individual. no information you submit to kagi is personal information except if you use your real email address to register"[0]

[0]: https://d-shoot.net/img/kagi/weregood3.png

replies(2): >>41834674 #>>41835719 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.41834674[source]
The image looks like it's from this post [1].

Long story short, this appears to be a case of a CEO needing to restrain themselves from saying (or typing) everything that comes to mind when faced with a combative user who clearly isn't trying to understand something or bring anything to the table.

At the end of the day, what you care about when it comes to privacy in search are your search records. They say--in a way that generates liablity--that they don't store them. I see no reason for them to break that promise. Between a commercial VPN and Kagi, I trust Kagi more.

[1] https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

replies(4): >>41834736 #>>41835232 #>>41835342 #>>41835645 #
politelemon ◴[] No.41835232[source]
Tangent to that, I hadn't realised their Orion browser was mac only, which is a flag of some colour to me. A company that takes privacy seriously ought to be taking Linux or cross platform seriously and if they do not I assume they do not.
replies(2): >>41836158 #>>41837371 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.41837371{3}[source]
> company that takes privacy seriously ought to be taking Linux or cross platform seriously

Going out on a limb, but guessing that the chief hurdle a company like Kagi faces is willingness to pay. I'm going to guess the 'this is a great product, but I just can't bring myself to pay more than 20¢ per year for search' crowd is crowded in Linux. (I may be totally wrong on this!)