←back to thread

162 points lr0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.346s | source
Show context
depingus ◴[] No.41834664[source]
I hope Kagi succeeds. But personally, I think the web is dead. And no search engine can save it.

SEO spam has been strangling the web for years. Now, genAI SEO spam has escalated that onto inhuman levels. To make matters worse, no one wants to post to the open web anymore because their posts are just going to drown in that sea of spam and only genai's data stealing bots will read them. As the amount of spam posted to the web increases, the amount of worthwhile content posted decreases. Eventually, nothing of value will be posted. (like facebook?)

You can lay the blame for the web's death squarely at Google's feet for allowing SEO to hijack search in the first place (or maybe the government is to blame for not breaking up Google's ad/search empire fast enough). Either way, the big companies all know the end is here and are gambling on genai to replace search. Already, places of knowledge are closing their borders and charging fees for genai to access.

We have entered the internet's dark age.

Fun aside: I think it's hilarious and fitting that Google's genai model sucks. And I hope they lose the genai wars (just out of spite, not because I think any other genai is worth a shit).

replies(13): >>41834760 #>>41834783 #>>41834885 #>>41834943 #>>41835107 #>>41835108 #>>41835124 #>>41835344 #>>41835519 #>>41835731 #>>41835911 #>>41835926 #>>41840972 #
dazc ◴[] No.41834943[source]
You cite Facebook as an example of no meaningful content yet put all the blame upon Google? Maybe content creators are just incentivised into giving 90 percent of the public what they want.
replies(2): >>41834992 #>>41836125 #
1. bryanrasmussen ◴[] No.41836125[source]
I figure if 90% of everything is crap, https://medium.com/luminasticity/90-crap-48e4c79419a9 then if the amount of available content has doubled in a decade, that is probably just too much crap to find the good stuff.