←back to thread

162 points lr0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
RamiAwar ◴[] No.41834309[source]
I would convert, but price is too high for me personally.

I'd be willing to pay up to 3$ a month for my searches, but also per-use.

If I make 0 searches, why do I need to pay?

A replacement for Google that is to survive should really convince and be super cheap, it's so easy to ignore sponsored search results (for now).

replies(5): >>41834337 #>>41834365 #>>41834419 #>>41834423 #>>41834490 #
evoke4908 ◴[] No.41834365[source]
You either pay a flat fee, or you have to deal with the added baggage of considering that each search costs you a very real half a cent or whatever.

Would you use your search engine more if every search query were an implicit microtransaction? Would you use it more or less if you had to consider that your first search of the month cost $3, or if it's the last day of the month and you need to search for something but you have to wait to not incur a full month's fee.

This is one of those arguments that sounds reasonable but isn't. Nothing but a flat fee structure makes sense for something you'll be doing hundreds if not thousands of times a month. And let's be real: if you're the kind of person who could go a full month with no web searches, you don't want or need what Kagi is offering.

replies(3): >>41834940 #>>41834993 #>>41835296 #
1. pzmarzly ◴[] No.41834993[source]
Almost everyone is paying for their electricity based on usage, and yet people don't seem to think "this will cost me a dollar" when turning on the washing machine (unless really short on money). I think usage-based SaaS subscriptions could make sense from user's perspective, they are just too uncommon right now.