←back to thread

322 points DamonHD | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.019s | source
Show context
xorcist ◴[] No.41830084[source]
BBSes was such a huge part of being into computers in the 80s and 90s.

I really wish this culture could be understood by future generations. Yes, we have the BBS Documentary movie but we need so much more. Everything non-US is underdocumented, and all the subcultures such as the eLiTe scene, the demo scene, the vision impaired stuff, all of that risks being forgotten with time.

replies(5): >>41830264 #>>41830526 #>>41830794 #>>41831816 #>>41832706 #
squigz ◴[] No.41832706[source]
Could you elaborate on 'the vision impaired stuff'? I'm visually impaired myself so I'm intrigued.

The demo scene is still alive and kicking, by the by :)

replies(1): >>41832778 #
toxic ◴[] No.41832778[source]
One of the more popular DOS-based BBS software platforms of the early 90s was VBBS. It was interoperable with WWIVnet, which is part of why it was popular.

Its author/developer/maintainer was blind. You can imagine how well it worked with screen readers and other accessible technology (which was primitive at the time, and yet somehow better than it is today).

Text on a terminal is much better suited to accessibility technologies, whether readers or braille terminals. BBSes were all about text on terminals, and it was a place where folks who used accessibility tools could choose whether to identify themselves as someone who needed it... and most of the time if they chose not to make it known, none of the other users had any idea.

"You are your own words" is a BBS-ism. For people who are in the deaf community or who used tools because of their sight, being able to be known primarily by their words and not by the way that they used them was absolutely incredible.

(edit: typo)

replies(2): >>41832857 #>>41862304 #
gausswho ◴[] No.41832857[source]
This is increasingly fascinating.

I want to see a documentary of this in the style of alternating scenes of a) narration over still photos and b) contemporary music alongside silent video of the people behind this community.

replies(1): >>41834495 #
1. textfiles ◴[] No.41834495{3}[source]
Someone should get right on that.
replies(1): >>41856850 #
2. squigz ◴[] No.41856850[source]
I've been thinking this comment was just unnecessary snark, but... :P

http://www.bbsdocumentary.com/director.html