←back to thread

259 points zdw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
matrix2003 ◴[] No.41832921[source]
Someone gave me an analogy some time ago that made a lot of sense.

If you shine a flashlight through a tree blowing in the wind and vary the brightness to convey information, the signal can get distorted pretty easily.

However, if you have a constant brightness source and vary the color, it’s a lot easier to figure out what the source is trying to convey.

replies(10): >>41832935 #>>41832942 #>>41832971 #>>41832984 #>>41833031 #>>41833220 #>>41833256 #>>41834625 #>>41835757 #>>41839320 #
reader9274 ◴[] No.41833031[source]
I always shy away from analogies because more often than not they give the wrong "feel" for a concept. But this is one of those rare exceptions.
replies(2): >>41833068 #>>41835118 #
Filligree ◴[] No.41833068[source]
It's not an analogy. This is precisely how it works.
replies(1): >>41833163 #
khazhoux ◴[] No.41833163[source]
Unless your car radio consists of a flashlight and a tree, this is an analogy.
replies(4): >>41833199 #>>41833202 #>>41833208 #>>41833318 #
senorrib ◴[] No.41833208[source]
Both concepts are based on frequency and amplitude of waves (radio vs light).
replies(1): >>41834375 #
1. khazhoux ◴[] No.41834375[source]
That's what makes the analogy so clear.