←back to thread

247 points nabla9 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bmitc ◴[] No.41833078[source]
Actually, the most counterintuitive is 4-dimensional space. It is rather mathematically unique, often exhibiting properties no other dimension does.
replies(3): >>41833147 #>>41833346 #>>41833385 #
elcritch ◴[] No.41833147[source]
How so?
replies(2): >>41833370 #>>41833379 #
bmitc ◴[] No.41833379[source]
There's a section here about phenomena in 4 dimensions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4-manifold

One of the most surprising is that all smooth manifolds of dimension not equal to four only have a finite number of unique smooth structures. For dimension four, there are countably infinite number of unique smooth structures. It's the only dimension with that property.

replies(2): >>41833602 #>>41833690 #
ashishb ◴[] No.41833690[source]
> One of the most surprising is that all smooth manifolds of dimension not equal to four only have a finite number of unique smooth structures. For dimension four, there are countably infinite number of unique smooth structures. It's the only dimension with that property.

Can you give some intuition on smooth structure and manifold? I read Wikipedia articles a few times but still can't grasp them.

replies(2): >>41833805 #>>41834315 #
1. aithrowawaycomm ◴[] No.41834315[source]
I am not sure the other comment was especially intuitive. Here is my understanding:

Euclidean space is a vector space and therefore pretty easy to work with in computations (especially calculus) compared to something like the surface of a sphere, but the sphere doesn't simply abandon Euclidean vector structure. We can take halves of the sphere and "flatten them out," so instead of working with the sphere we can work with two planes, keeping in mind that the flattening functions define the boundary of those planes we're allowed to work within. Then we can do computations on the plane and "unflatten" them to get the result of those computations on the sphere.

Manifolds are a generalization of this idea: you have a complicated topological structure S, but also some open subsets of S, S_i, which partition S, and smooth, invertible functions f_i: S_i -> R^n that tell you how to treat elements of S locally as if they were vectors in Euclidean space (and since the functions are invertible, it tells you how to map the vectors back to S, which is what you want).

The manifold is a pair, the space S and the smooth functions f_i. The smoothness is important because ultimately we are interested in doing calculus on S, so if the mapping functions have "sharp edges" then we're introducing sharp edges into S that are entirely a result of the mapping and not S's own geometry.