←back to thread

944 points 6a74 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dcchambers ◴[] No.41802586[source]
From a performance and technical perspective this is incredible. Well done!

It will never happen, but my dream is for the Asahi devs, Valve, and Apple to all get together to build out a cross-platform Proton to emulate and play games built for Windows on both x86 and ARM hardware running Linux.

A Steam Deck with the performance and power efficiency of an M-series ARM chip and the entire library of games that run on Proton is just...dreamy.

replies(10): >>41802934 #>>41802950 #>>41804002 #>>41804485 #>>41804629 #>>41805243 #>>41805690 #>>41805761 #>>41806717 #>>41809076 #
bmicraft ◴[] No.41804002[source]
An ARM CPU only emulating x86 isn't going to be more efficient than straight x86. ARM is barely more efficient as it is at those performance levels.

The real reason Apple is ahead is because they're paying for more expensive more advanced nodes for their CPUs. I you compare CPUs on similar node sizes, you'll see that AMD and Intel are basically caught up architecturally in perf/W metrics.

replies(2): >>41804770 #>>41806025 #
aurareturn ◴[] No.41804770[source]
This is definitely not true. M3 is 2x - 3x more efficient than Lunar Lake on the same N3B node.
replies(2): >>41804992 #>>41807646 #
high_na_euv ◴[] No.41807646[source]
Have you seen Lunars iGPU?
replies(1): >>41809142 #
aurareturn ◴[] No.41809142{3}[source]
Yes, M3 is still 2-3x more efficient than Lunar Lake’s GPU as long as it’s not games that were more optimized for x86 and or DirectX. For example, M3 generally wins in compute with a lot less power needed.
replies(1): >>41818741 #
1. high_na_euv ◴[] No.41818741{4}[source]
Src?