←back to thread

552 points freedomben | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.829s | source
Show context
Mrdarknezz ◴[] No.41809991[source]
Totally unrelated, firefox is an excellent browser
replies(2): >>41810027 #>>41813212 #
1. zb3 ◴[] No.41813212[source]
But not when you want to install GrapheneOS using the web-based installer, because Mozilla refuses to implement WebUSB
replies(1): >>41815498 #
2. contravariant ◴[] No.41815498[source]
Sounds like a reasonable trade-off.

I imagine they couldn't figure out what an appropriate warning window would look like for that kind of protocol.

replies(1): >>41817372 #
3. teruakohatu ◴[] No.41817372[source]
Chrome supports WebUSB. The bowser asks if you want to connect a device and presents a list of supported devices. It works amazingly well.
replies(1): >>41847370 #
4. account42 ◴[] No.41847370{3}[source]
So the user can be trusted to allow arbitrary websites raw access to potentially sensitive USB devices but cannot be trusted to give extensions the required access to fully block ads?