←back to thread

552 points freedomben | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
sho ◴[] No.41809962[source]
Hopefully this is the inflection point for Chrome. Despite all their made-up "security" reasons, everyone knows this is solely about making adblock less effective. For many users, adblock is what makes chrome bearable - and if they make it unbearable, then those users will leave. Slowly but surely.

Google seems much too sure of itself making this change. I hope their arrogance pays off just the same as Microsoft's did with IE.

replies(14): >>41810044 #>>41810118 #>>41810304 #>>41810320 #>>41810359 #>>41810375 #>>41810472 #>>41810519 #>>41810553 #>>41811938 #>>41812626 #>>41813079 #>>41813685 #>>41822203 #
Rychard ◴[] No.41810044[source]
The widespread adoption of Chrome was largely driven by word of mouth, people like you and I installing it on our friend's/relative's computers and telling them it was safer/faster/better.

Nothing stops us from doing the same thing again. I've been recommending Firefox to all my family/friends/colleagues for years (ever since I've seen the writing on the wall for Chrome). While Firefox isn't perfect, it's in a much better place than Chrome is, and meets the the needs of nearly 100% of people.

replies(4): >>41810119 #>>41810134 #>>41810545 #>>41816693 #
1. EasyMark ◴[] No.41810545[source]
Did you miss the barrage of ads for Chrome that google played for literally years on the internet and television?
replies(1): >>41815701 #
2. Zak ◴[] No.41815701[source]
Yes. Thanks adblock!