←back to thread

552 points freedomben | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
blakesterz ◴[] No.41809847[source]
Has anyone been using the v3 compatible version of uBlock Origin? Have you noticed much of a difference? From what I read there isn't supposed to be much of a difference?
replies(8): >>41809855 #>>41809863 #>>41809873 #>>41809987 #>>41810060 #>>41810246 #>>41810440 #>>41812912 #
kccqzy ◴[] No.41809855[source]
I have been using the Firefox version of it for more than a year by now, basically as soon as it came out. I commented on HN that I was going to do it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37219071

There's no difference whatsoever.

And it's not surprising because on my iOS device I've been using similarly architected content blockers since 2015. There's no issue with declarative ad blocking.

Of course this differs with the kind of sites you visit. So you need to try it on your own. I can believe that perhaps for some people this is a downgrade, but don't automatically assume uBlock Origin Lite won't work well for you.

replies(3): >>41810031 #>>41810168 #>>41810257 #
drivebycomment ◴[] No.41810031[source]
Anyone jumping up and down about MV3 while using Mac or iOS are hypocrites, since MV3 is essentially doing the same thing Safari did years ago, finally matching the security and the privacy in that regard. The reduction in adblocking is so miniscule in aggregate - since declarative approach will always cover all the major advertisers - that it's not even a meaningful "trade-off".
replies(3): >>41810082 #>>41810142 #>>41810156 #
1. SoftTalker ◴[] No.41810082[source]
I see boatloads of ads in Safari on iOS. To the point that web browsing on my phone is intolerable, so I don't do it.
replies(2): >>41810308 #>>41811151 #
2. kccqzy ◴[] No.41810308[source]
This is such a data-free anecdote. Which websites are showing ads? Which ad blocker did you install on iOS?
3. HDThoreaun ◴[] No.41811151[source]
Which adblocker are you using? I have adguard and dont get ads on most safari sites but its just static DNS blocking so first party ad servers like youtube dont get blocked.
replies(1): >>41819924 #
4. SoftTalker ◴[] No.41819924[source]
Why should I need an adblocker app from some third party to which I have to grant full control over my browser? Apple would be enormously popular if they included one by default. Perhaps as an option you could disable. I don't know why all browsers don't do this (well, I know why Chrome doesn't).

Browsers are selected by users, they should have no obligation to show ads.

Brave is the only one doing this right AFAIK.

Almost all the problems with tracking and buying and selling user profiles would end if browsers just didn't show ads.