←back to thread

325 points ragebol | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
drrotmos ◴[] No.41530826[source]
The more I think about the more I feel that this is the wrong solution to the problem. Disclaimer: I'm doing a small open source espresso controller project, check it out if you're interested, but it's not ready for prime time yet: https://github.com/variegated-coffee.

My thinking is that this machine appeals mostly to people who already has an espresso machine. It's not particularly technologically advanced. It's a single boiler, an E61 group and a vibratory pump. If you're buying this machine, you're probably replacing a machine at a similar technology level, and that's not really a sustainable choice.

A well maintained espresso machine has a lifespan in the range of decades. Many recent innovations in espresso machines is mostly controllers, sensors and actuators. Also better pumps. These are all things that can easily be retrofitted to an older espresso machine.

There has been innovation in other areas not easily retrofittable (saturated groups, dual boilers instead of heat-exchangers, to name a few), but this machine doesn't really feature any of those.

I strongly believe that in this particular demographic, it's a much better (more sustainable, cheaper and all around more fun) idea to retrofit new and advanced parts to the espresso machine they presumably already have, than to buy a whole new machine. We don't need old espresso machines on landfills.

On the off chance that a prospective buyer doesn't already have a similar espresso machine, this isn't too bad of a choice, and the price is decent, but on the other hand, there are a lot of used machines on the market that are looking for a new owner and can be upgraded.

replies(10): >>41531089 #>>41531248 #>>41531808 #>>41531833 #>>41532693 #>>41533035 #>>41533596 #>>41536173 #>>41538489 #>>41542292 #
zero_iq ◴[] No.41531089[source]
It's also at least as expensive as more advanced machines you can buy already-assembled.

If this was half the price, I might be interested. But if I wanted a coffee maker with open source control, I'd probably just hack an existing cheaper product. And I'm someone who absolutely loves assembling stuff from kits!

Heck, I'd be surprised if someone hasn't already got Doom running on a Sage.

replies(2): >>41531369 #>>41532518 #
dfxm12 ◴[] No.41531369[source]
It's also at least as expensive as more advanced machines you can buy already-assembled.

Exactly. The parent post mentions this being "the wrong solution to the problem", but I don't know what the problem is this product is addressing. E61 machines are well understood and diagrammed with (somewhat) interchangeable parts. If this product appeals to you, you can buy a cheaper/similarly priced machine, take it apart and put it back together yourself.

replies(3): >>41531504 #>>41531521 #>>41532627 #
drrotmos ◴[] No.41531521[source]
Oh, don't get me started on what the problem is :D

* Espresso machine electronics are very proprietary. There's basically one manufacturer, no published schematics and very closed firmwares.

* That one manufacturer's hardware occasionally breaks and needs replacement, and they charge up the wazoo for it.

* Firmware updates is not a thing. Buying a new controller with the new firmware is your only option.

* Espresso machine electronics hardware is pretty firmly stuck in the past. If you're lucky you have a 128x64 px OLED, but more likely you have LED indicators, 7 segment displays, or graphical LCDs.

There are absolutely exceptions to this, but for 95% of the espresso machines out there, you're definitely not getting the full potential of the hardware.

replies(3): >>41531675 #>>41532633 #>>41533226 #
hiatus ◴[] No.41533226[source]
> * Espresso machine electronics hardware is pretty firmly stuck in the past. If you're lucky you have a 128x64 px OLED, but more likely you have LED indicators, 7 segment displays, or graphical LCDs.

I don't know if I'd consider adding a screen to an espresso machine to be an improvement. What would it be useful for?

replies(1): >>41534322 #
dgacmu ◴[] No.41534322[source]
I have a no-display machine and I wish it had a few things that a screen would facilitate:

(1) Automatic shot timer.

(2) Shot volume display (my machine is a volumetric one, but I have to measure the weight of the output to calculate what volume it dispensed)

(3) Ability to configure other parameters, such as pre-infusion time, where I'm guessing the manufacturer just left this out because it would complicate an already kind of painful button + LED UI.

I also wish it had a group head temperature sensor, but that would add more hardware to the machine than just the screen.

replies(1): >>41535638 #
1. secabeen ◴[] No.41535638[source]
All this exists from Decent Espresso, but they are the 1% of the market that is the exception.
replies(1): >>41539152 #
2. mathgeek ◴[] No.41539152[source]
I think we’re coming full circle back to identifying what this company is trying to solve for.