←back to thread

325 points ragebol | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.622s | source
Show context
wkat4242 ◴[] No.41524558[source]
I love espresso. But I don't think I'd be interested in a DIY option.

I tend to use Nespresso, especially now that the cups are simply available in the shop (and cheap aftermarket options), it's pretty perfect.

I know the manual process is more environmentally friendly but when I wake up in the morning I have no headspace for fussing with coffee grinds. I just need good coffee right away. And I don't even own a car or anything nor have kids so my footprint is pretty low.

replies(6): >>41524608 #>>41524797 #>>41524852 #>>41524875 #>>41525113 #>>41529963 #
ben7799 ◴[] No.41524875[source]
Well the bigger problem with Nespresso is the coffee/espresso tastes horrible and you have to deal with the waste.
replies(4): >>41525167 #>>41525187 #>>41525260 #>>41530068 #
talldayo ◴[] No.41525187[source]
Bingo. My barista opinion is that every Nespresso tastes like a Cafe Americano a-la Keurig. You can buy a $4 bag of Cafe Bustelo (pre-ground) and get both better tasting and cheaper espresso. If anyone in this thread is considering a Nespresso/Keurig, I'd highly recommend they consider a similarly-priced espresso machine for multiple reasons. Compared to ESE (easy serve espresso), Nespresso is the Juicero of coffee.
replies(1): >>41525273 #
1. wkat4242 ◴[] No.41525273[source]
If you make it a long drink yes (which you shouldn't as it overextracts). If you run it on the short program it's pretty strong. At least with local pods here in Spain.
replies(1): >>41526354 #
2. hocuspocus ◴[] No.41526354[source]
Following Nespresso's own recommendations, the shortest program is still pulling 25 ml through <6g of coffee.

A far cry from a proper 1:2 espresso, let alone ristretto.

replies(1): >>41532452 #
3. wkat4242 ◴[] No.41532452[source]
Yeah ristretto it's not. But I do like some liquid and not too much caffeine.

I usually drink doubles with 1 normal and 1 decaf so I don't end up bouncing :P