←back to thread

420 points rvz | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.022s | source
Show context
ryzvonusef ◴[] No.41415447[source]
Twitter is 'banned' in Pakistan for very similar reasons (requiring a local representative, requiring censorship, etc) under the guise of 'national security concerns'.

We are all still using it via VPN. We get all the govt related info from it, and no one is asking, how come the govt dept themselves are using twitter when it's banned?

No one will move to bluesky/threads/mastodon because as I said everyone is on twitter.

Afterall, if I want to know about the next road blockage or electricity outage, I know I need to go to twitter to check, where else would I go?

these are bullship tactics, but they seem to be working, and the internet is fracturing. It was nice while it lasted, but we will no loner have a 'world-wide' web, just national networks with passport controls on accessing external nets.

replies(4): >>41415609 #>>41415921 #>>41417523 #>>41417864 #
1. throwadobe ◴[] No.41417864[source]
What's happening in Pakistan has no bearing on what's happening in Brazil. Just because "twitter is banned" in both countries doesn't mean it was banned for the same reasons or that the ban applies in the same way.
replies(2): >>41418064 #>>41418871 #
2. ryzvonusef ◴[] No.41418064[source]
Absolutely, I understand Brazil and Pakistan are two different countries, I just wanted to share my own experiences to provide some interesting insight on how people react to bans.

In Brazil, people are apparently moving to BlueSky, but in my country, we didn't move platforms, we just to jump over the fence via VPNs.

3. blackeyeblitzar ◴[] No.41421451{3}[source]
[flagged]