←back to thread

420 points rvz | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.626s | source | bottom
1. seanvelasco ◴[] No.41416345[source]
I like Bluesky, its devs, and its tech. I even built a third-party web client for it in Solid.js. But I find Bluesky to be too toxic. There's too much unwanted nudity, even if all my filters are turned on.
replies(6): >>41417648 #>>41418077 #>>41418079 #>>41418195 #>>41418738 #>>41420335 #
2. _heimdall ◴[] No.41417648[source]
That's really the core of the social media problem though. Social platforms are asked to, and signing themselves up to, walk the fine line between free speech and content moderation.

Ultimately they are private platforms and as far as I'm concerned they can censor as much or as little as they want, but its a fundamental problem of any algorithmically managed feed of user generated content. There's no easy fix there and you'll always piss of a large chunk of the population.

3. davidcbc ◴[] No.41418077[source]
I have never seen any nudity on bsky and I've been using it for more than a year
4. newZWhoDis ◴[] No.41418079[source]
Now this is how you do guerrilla marketing.
5. Maken ◴[] No.41418195[source]
Really? I need to investigate that further.
6. jazzyjackson ◴[] No.41418738[source]
I wonder if anyone's doing intersections and differences on feeds yet - would be awesome if there were people aggregating all the only fans accounts so I could just subtract that from my algorithmic feed.
7. ◴[] No.41420335[source]