(www.theverge.com)

420 points rvz | 3 comments | 31 Aug 24 13:28 UTC | HN request time: 0.577s | source

Show context

Laaas ◴[31 Aug 24 15:03 UTC] No.41409386[source]▶

They will ban Bluesky too if it gets too popular .

slashdave ◴[01 Sep 24 00:59 UTC] No.41413309[source]▶

Not so sure. I mean, as long as Bluesky doesn't just simply ignore a judge. Also, there has been some backlash.

replies(1): >>41414920 #

1. extheat ◴[01 Sep 24 07:08 UTC] No.41414920[source]▶

Bluesky isn’t a centralized service, the developers cannot themselves comply with judicial orders (any of them).

2. nunobrito ◴[01 Sep 24 09:09 UTC] No.41415397[source]▶

It is centralized. Just block the app and domain, down it goes.

Very different when compared to NOSTR, where are a variety of domains and apps keep popping up everywhere around the globe.

3. slashdave ◴[02 Sep 24 05:15 UTC] No.41422793[source]▶

Bluesky can block its own users. I don't see why they would be responsible for anything else beyond that.

Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky