←back to thread

420 points rvz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
nickpsecurity ◴[] No.41409175[source]
One of the linked articles said it boiled down to X being ordered to censor political opponents of those in power. They chose not to. I’m glad.

Now, traffic is going to Bluesky. I wonder if this means that Bluesky has or will be offered the same choice. We might see what the character of that organization is by what choice they make.

replies(5): >>41409222 #>>41409280 #>>41410649 #>>41414032 #>>41418351 #
throwadobe ◴[] No.41414032[source]
It boiled down to X not taking down accounts associated with individuals with outstanding warrants who were inciting violence. Brazilian law requires X to do so.
replies(3): >>41414182 #>>41414802 #>>41418371 #
1. UberFly ◴[] No.41414802[source]
>X not taking down accounts associated with individuals with outstanding warrants who were inciting violence

God this sounds so 1984-ish.