←back to thread

420 points rvz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
joejohnson ◴[] No.41409095[source]
Hopefully most people migrate to one of the alternatives not owned by an American oligarch
replies(1): >>41409158 #
adventured ◴[] No.41409158[source]
There are no possible alternatives to US based services unless you enjoy extreme restrictions on speech. Europe has become a big no-go zone for speech over the past decade, they're outright hostile and authoritarian about it (with only a few exceptions among European nations). And the direction re liberalism and human rights in Europe is overwhelmingly hostile toward speech. And for South America, Africa and Asia you can entirely forget about it, there are no reliable speech protected locations in any of those.
replies(3): >>41409176 #>>41409219 #>>41409264 #
mstipetic[dead post] ◴[] No.41409219[source]
[flagged]
1. Aerroon ◴[] No.41414585[source]
The US is a ~250 year old continuous democracy. Almost no European states can say the same. After WW1 a lot of democratic European states popped up. Two decades later half of them were autocratic.

I think it's half that our governments don't want to give away control, lest the peasants become uppity. And the other half is that that's just how the dice landed when the laws were first created.