←back to thread

420 points rvz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
joejohnson ◴[] No.41409095[source]
Hopefully most people migrate to one of the alternatives not owned by an American oligarch
replies(1): >>41409158 #
adventured ◴[] No.41409158[source]
There are no possible alternatives to US based services unless you enjoy extreme restrictions on speech. Europe has become a big no-go zone for speech over the past decade, they're outright hostile and authoritarian about it (with only a few exceptions among European nations). And the direction re liberalism and human rights in Europe is overwhelmingly hostile toward speech. And for South America, Africa and Asia you can entirely forget about it, there are no reliable speech protected locations in any of those.
replies(3): >>41409176 #>>41409219 #>>41409264 #
mstipetic[dead post] ◴[] No.41409219[source]
[flagged]
tirant ◴[] No.41409306[source]
The spread of lies or false information has always been the price the pay in order to have free speech.

It is the task of the individuals in free societies to discern the lies from the truth, or at least to choose their tools in doing so.

You’re lying to yourself if you believe you can have real human free speech with a system capable of censoring all lies.

replies(2): >>41409563 #>>41412941 #
1. brightball ◴[] No.41412941[source]
Yes. We are supposed to be able to rely on evidence from investigations and hungry reporters with integrity to expose the truth eventually.