←back to thread

634 points david927 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.392s | source

What are you working on? Any new ideas that you're thinking about?
Show context
anon012012 ◴[] No.41346126[source]
I am working alone on https://tree-of-knowledge.org

This is a hierarchical representation of any given piece of knowledge.

It starts with a tree root node that you specify (let's say Kung fu), then it branches out into multiples subcategories (techniques, styles, philosophy, weaponry, ect...) and then you can click on these subcategories to branch out even more into the graphical tree.

This is all generated on-the-fly with Claude 3.5. There is no limit to what knowledge you might explore.

The killer feature is that it is totally free and does not require to login. Just click the link and have fun. I'll keep it free like that, as long as I can.

I hope you like it guys because it is the best project that I have up my sleeve.

Enjoy!,

Pierre

replies(17): >>41346212 #>>41346255 #>>41346303 #>>41346512 #>>41346785 #>>41346847 #>>41347606 #>>41348347 #>>41348554 #>>41353417 #>>41358007 #>>41360370 #>>41362295 #>>41363608 #>>41367894 #>>41381490 #>>41384140 #
WillAdams ◴[] No.41348347[source]
Making a note to try this when it's not slashdotted (hackernewsed?).

This sort of thing is _very_ interesting to me, and I rather desperately want something like to this tied to listings of books.

I would like to read more diversely --- at one time I was trying to read one book from each LoC division, starting at the top/broadest (so A--Z), then iterating down, but this got to be exhausting because it was difficult to determine which book to read.

A later effort was to read biographies of famous people to my children in chronological order as they were growing up --- dry run was the very simple set of U.S. Presidents --- but again researching and ordering was a big problem.

So, my hopes for this are that it includes footnotes/references/links to supporting material (perhaps affiliate links on Amazon would be one way to fund things?) and that it is possible to click through to find information on specific technical topics as well as general explanations.

replies(1): >>41359510 #
anon012012 ◴[] No.41359510[source]
Thanks. I had tried that but the AI keeps inventing false books or providing fake URLs. When the AI will be proper I will include that feature, for sure!
replies(1): >>41364241 #
1. WillAdams ◴[] No.41364241[source]
A worrisome problem.

I take it that there isn't a strict factual/non-factual (fiction) toggle?