←back to thread

Sourcegraph went dark

(eric-fritz.com)
424 points kaycebasques | 3 comments | 20 Aug 24 03:30 UTC | HN request time: 0.652s | source
Show context
yablak ◴[20 Aug 24 07:06 UTC] No.41297545[source]▶
Sourcegraph search is amazing. I can point to any hash in our repo and search by regex/path regex. Results are instant and in json format. I hacked together a 'cs' script in bash using the sg cli client and some git calls, as I missed Google's cs command since leaving. Works perfectly, faster than ctags/any local indexer.
replies(2): >>41298666 #>>41307070 #
1. sqs ◴[20 Aug 24 10:32 UTC] No.41298666[source]▶
Awesome to hear! What sucks about Sourcegraph for you, and how can we make it better?
replies(1): >>41299585 #
2. PaulCarrack ◴[20 Aug 24 12:48 UTC] No.41299585[source]▶
I use Sourcegraph for personal use with my private repos.

In the past, I've found actual bugs that I reported to Justin Dorfman and worked with him to get those bugs assigned to the right engineers so they got fixed before your enterprise customers can experience them.

1. Is there still a path for reporting issues now that the repo has gone private? The Github issue tracker can no longer be accessed or searched through to report bugs or figure out if a bug is known or being worked on.

2. Do you plan to get rid of "Sourcegraph Free" for on premise personal use?

replies(1): >>41321940 #
3. sqs ◴[22 Aug 24 16:28 UTC] No.41321940[source]▶
Thanks for helping us make the product better! You can post any issues at https://community.sourcegraph.com. And you can also email support@sourcegraph.com (for customers or any private issues).

We will continue to have a free tier for personal use. Soon we will have a free tier of code search on Sourcegraph.com for private code.