←back to thread

1113 points Bluestein | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
lairv ◴[] No.41278203[source]
I use it to inspect video frames by frames, particularly being able to go back one frame. VLC doesn't support it, this thread about the feature is hilarious https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?t=120627
replies(19): >>41278382 #>>41278499 #>>41278639 #>>41278719 #>>41279342 #>>41279364 #>>41279561 #>>41279827 #>>41279842 #>>41279920 #>>41280125 #>>41281214 #>>41281733 #>>41282953 #>>41283275 #>>41284169 #>>41287180 #>>41289348 #>>41289743 #
efilife ◴[] No.41278499[source]
VLC is pretty bad and it shows the more you use it.

It doesn't let the audio clip/exceed safe volumes and always applies some sort of a limiter, even if it's disabled everywhere in the settings. Try using an EQ on a bass-heavy track and see that it's limited.

Try jumping back multiple times in a song at its beginning, and it will play in lower pitch.

replies(3): >>41279346 #>>41279495 #>>41282325 #
darby_nine ◴[] No.41279346[source]
> VLC is pretty bad and it shows the more you use it.

Compared to what? Such a statement is meaningless without comparison.

replies(1): >>41279556 #
opan ◴[] No.41279556[source]
Compared to mpv. Some would also say compared to mpc-hc.
replies(3): >>41279594 #>>41280179 #>>41294565 #
1. hollerith ◴[] No.41279594[source]
The first sentence on https://mpc-hc.org/ is, "MPC-HC is not under development since 2017. Please switch to something else."
replies(2): >>41279850 #>>41279914 #
2. infofarmer ◴[] No.41279850[source]
search engines and wikipedia point to actively maintained versions
3. defrost ◴[] No.41279914[source]
Instead of MPC-HC v1.7.13 (2017) maybe try MPC-HC v2.3.4 (2024)

https://github.com/clsid2/mpc-hc

In many ways it's a display wrapper about codec components, the display part is in active maintainance and bug fix mode (last update two weeks ago) and the codecs are constantly being improved (and expanded as new ones emerge).

https://www.codecguide.com/

There are two or three MPC-HC spin offs that are tweaking the core to do new things.

replies(1): >>41283251 #
4. rocketvole ◴[] No.41283251[source]
it's annoying that the clsid fork isn't associated with the website- it adds a lot of confusion to what is probably the video player that compromises between user friendliness and customizability. It's usually the video player that I recommend to people because it seems beter than vlc and has a GUI for settings as opposed to mpv.
replies(1): >>41289906 #
5. account42 ◴[] No.41289906{3}[source]
This is one of the many reasons why forks should use a distinctive name to differentiate themselves. Just realeasing new versions with the same name as the upstream project is generally a dick move.
replies(1): >>41291910 #
6. SirMaster ◴[] No.41291910{4}[source]
I am pretty sure the dev (clsid2) worked on mpc-hc originally as well before.