Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    1113 points Bluestein | 15 comments | | HN request time: 0.467s | source | bottom
    1. mathfailure ◴[] No.41277389[source]
    The best media player available on linux. The worst GUI (none) out of the box. Bearable after tinkering a bit with configs.
    replies(5): >>41277425 #>>41277816 #>>41277831 #>>41278106 #>>41278240 #
    2. Bluestein ◴[] No.41277425[source]
    > The best media player available on linux

    Strong clam, this ...

    PS. For the controversy: Please note I am not disputing the claim - particularly when many claim this is the best player on any platform, not just Linux.-

    replies(1): >>41277474 #
    3. pengaru ◴[] No.41277474[source]
    > Strong clam, this ...

    What's better?

    replies(1): >>41277564 #
    4. lottin ◴[] No.41277564{3}[source]
    mplayer
    replies(3): >>41277815 #>>41277886 #>>41278511 #
    5. prurigro ◴[] No.41277815{4}[source]
    Isn't mpv a more modern and maintained mplayer fork? Mplayer was my go-to for many many years, starting in the early 2000s, but I switched at one point and can't remember why. What do you prefer about mplayer?
    replies(1): >>41278219 #
    6. vocx2tx ◴[] No.41277816[source]
    > The worst GUI (none) out of the box.

    That's funny, for me that's exactly the best GUI out of the box. I actually did some tinkering to reduce the GUI parts even more, and added more keyboard shortcuts.

    7. sgc ◴[] No.41277831[source]
    I use SMPlayer as a front end for mpv (you can select mplayer or mpv as backend). Not sure if that is common or even a good idea. But I am generally happy with it.
    replies(1): >>41280030 #
    8. chgs ◴[] No.41277886{4}[source]
    I used played for 20+ years but moved to mpv recently as I ran into a couple of things player won’t work with.

    Struggling to see the benefit of mplayer over mpv today.

    9. quohort ◴[] No.41278106[source]
    try celluloid https://github.com/celluloid-player/celluloid
    10. lottin ◴[] No.41278219{5}[source]
    If I recall correctly, for a brief time mplayer disappeared from Debian. At the time I evaluated various alternatives and mpv was one of them, but I switched back to mplayer as soon as it made its way back to the distribution. For me, mplayer is the standard media player. I guess I just don't see any reason to switch to mpv or to any other player.
    replies(1): >>41278834 #
    11. globular-toast ◴[] No.41278240[source]
    It does have a GUI in the form of video overlays. For me it's perfect. By default it just shows the video which is both necessary and sufficient.
    12. loeg ◴[] No.41278511{4}[source]
    mpv is an active mplayer fork.
    13. pengaru ◴[] No.41278834{6}[source]
    I see no reason to cling to mplayer/mplayer2, mpv has pushed things forward from there.

    mplayer is what I used to use ages ago, can't think of a single thing I miss that it did which mpv doesn't. Like you, I was introduced to mpv through the debian disappearance, and it's been fine. Forks can be necessary to keep development active; it's one of the core features of FOSS.

    replies(1): >>41279723 #
    14. chungy ◴[] No.41279723{7}[source]
    mplayer has DVD menu support, mpv doesn't. I use Kodi if I need to navigate DVD menus these days, which is rare but it happens...
    15. Glyptodon ◴[] No.41280030[source]
    That's funny. SMPlayer was my preferred MPlayer front end before I switched to MPV years ago. And I've never really felt like I needed more GUI for MPV.