←back to thread

74 points holmofyHu | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.277s | source
1. netsharc ◴[] No.41276080[source]
Huh, the name collisions won't be confusing at all...

Here's hoping for a cease & desist of the use of the name, because I don't feel like having to filter through all the Rustian examples when I search for how to solve something in the actual Spring context.

replies(2): >>41276574 #>>41280593 #
2. nirvdrum ◴[] No.41276574[source]
For what it’s worth, I thought the same thing when Rails added a component called “Spring”. I thought it would lead to needless search conflicts since they’re both used for web development. But, it’s mostly been a non-issue.
3. chii ◴[] No.41280593[source]
should've name it something like 'rusty-coil', and not name clash with spring!