←back to thread

460 points wglb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.257s | source
Show context
VikingCoder ◴[] No.41202292[source]
Remember *69? You'd get the phone number of the person who just called you? (Theoretically - it didn't always work.)

How in the hell do we not have a trivial "report a scam" option on phone calls and text messages? Which reports it to the FTC or FBI or something?

replies(2): >>41203277 #>>41206598 #
shkkmo ◴[] No.41203277[source]
The easier reporting becomes, the more the average quality of reports decreases.

So making reporting easier is good only if you already have atleast sufficient resources to process and follow up on the current report volume. My understanding is that we don't currently have enough resources dedicated to handling the reports we do get of people who got scammed. If that is the case, then making it easier to report potential scams doesn't help until we increase the resources for tracking down and stopping scammers.

replies(1): >>41231063 #
1. VikingCoder ◴[] No.41231063[source]
You really think the quality of bug reports go down the easier it is to report bugs?

I find when I can send feedback in a way that captures enough context that the resulting bugs are very high quality.

If I could report a call from a scammer in such a way that the investigator heard the entire conversation...? I think that would be incredibly damning.