←back to thread

Okay, I Like WezTerm

(alexplescan.com)
488 points alexpls | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.547s | source
Show context
leblancfg ◴[] No.41224245[source]
Recently switched to WezTerm and I'm very happy. Was using kitty before that – loved the set up and simplicity coming from iTerm2. WezTerm is leaps and bounds better in terms of what comes out-of-the-box. My terminal config is short enough to sit all in one screen on my editor. After that, the terminal just... gets out of the way and I don't need to think about it.

But the straw that broke my back with using kitty was, I'd end up encountering issues or trying to recreate some of iTerm2's features, only to end up time and again on kitty's maintainer's terse and dismissive comments.

e.g. IIRC his answer to "How do I set up tmux with kitty?" was something like "Don't, tmux is dumb" and closing it. Eventually I gave up.

replies(13): >>41224353 #>>41224451 #>>41225545 #>>41225699 #>>41226105 #>>41226387 #>>41228168 #>>41228348 #>>41229104 #>>41231822 #>>41234027 #>>41235510 #>>41264822 #
saurik ◴[] No.41224451[source]
Yeah: the kitty developer is definitely the sort who believes that he not only knows better than everyone else how to use a terminal, but that everyone else's opinions are fundamentally invalid. That his terminal fails to correctly render such stalwarts as the Linux "make menuconfig" UI and there are no settings to fix it as he doesn't believe in settings is, to me, telling. I then find reading his posts on issue trackers not just insulting, but even "activating" in a way that is really unhealthy, as it results in me feeling a need to "defend" some random bit of terminal usage with just as much vigor, lest he get away with making everyone else sound like THEY are crazy... it really isn't healthy. I can't know for sure--as we don't live in this reality--but I'd like to think that, even if he and I agreed on literally everything there is to do with terminals, that I'd still have the same mindset that I'd rather write my own terminal than ever use his.
replies(3): >>41224758 #>>41225176 #>>41226592 #
actinium226 ◴[] No.41224758[source]
I guess this is what people mean when they say a piece of software is "opinionated"?
replies(3): >>41225025 #>>41225217 #>>41225691 #
1. leblancfg ◴[] No.41225217[source]
"opinionated" != "jerk"
replies(1): >>41225426 #
2. slightwinder ◴[] No.41225426[source]
How is the dev a jerk when they don't want to invest time into patching their app for the quirks of another app? Especially when kitty seems to have tmux-abilities out-of-the-box. I mean, you can like their solution or not, but calling them a jerk for not supporting your way?