←back to thread

Betting on DSPy for Systems of LLMs

(blog.isaacmiller.dev)
83 points wavelander | 1 comments | 11 Aug 24 02:11 UTC | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
gunalx ◴[11 Aug 24 11:34 UTC] No.41215483[source]▶
Not to say anything about dspy, but I really liked the take on hvat we should use llms for.

We need to stop doing useless reasoning stuff, and find acttual fitting problems for the llms to solve.

Current llms are not your db manager(if they could be you don't have a db size in the real world). They are not a developer. We have people for that.

Llms prove to be decent creative tools, classificators, and qna answer generators.

replies(1): >>41221174 #
1. isaacfung ◴[12 Aug 24 04:31 UTC] No.41221174[source]▶
We have translators. Doesn't mean we can't replace them with a cheaper, more accessible tool. That's the whole point of automation.

Reasoning stuff is not useless. They provably(according to benchmarks) improve the performance of coding and math related tasks.