←back to thread

700 points elipsitz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nimish ◴[] No.41194268[source]
Gross, the dev board uses micro-USB. It's 2024! Otherwise amazing work. Exactly what's needed to compete with the existing giants.
replies(4): >>41194477 #>>41194889 #>>41195331 #>>41196293 #
janice1999 ◴[] No.41194889[source]
It saves cost and none of the features of USB-C (speed, power delivery etc) are supported. Makes sense.
replies(2): >>41197522 #>>41199013 #
str3wer ◴[] No.41197522[source]
the price difference from usb to usb-c is less than 2 cents
replies(2): >>41197710 #>>41200495 #
rldjbpin ◴[] No.41200495[source]
devil's advocate: cables for an average user is a different story. also not to forget the vast range of cables already existing out there.

also "proper" usb-c support is another can of worms, and maybe sticking to an older standard gives you freedom from all that.

replies(2): >>41200961 #>>41205674 #
g15jv2dp ◴[] No.41200961[source]
You're confusing USB C and USB 3.1+. USB C is just the physical spec. You can design a cheap device that will only support USB 2 if you just connect ground, Vbus, D+ and D- and gasp add two resistors. It will work just as well as the micro-usb plug.
replies(1): >>41214731 #
rldjbpin ◴[] No.41214731[source]
completely valid, but i would like to think the org is still designing for accessibility for newbies in mind.

like you said, the connector does not have to follow the standards. i have seen hdmi ports being used to carry pcie signal (not a good like but here is one such device https://pipci.jeffgeerling.com/cards_adapter/pce164p-no6-ver...) amgon other things. it is still non-standard behaviour.

replies(1): >>41215847 #
1. g15jv2dp ◴[] No.41215847{3}[source]
Using an USB C port to carry an USB 2.0 signal is perfectly within the standards.