←back to thread

563 points joncfoo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
dawnerd ◴[] No.41206087[source]
I'm still peeved they let google take over .dev when they knew tons of us used that in the older days for dev environments.
replies(3): >>41206099 #>>41210702 #>>41221314 #
TheRealPomax ◴[] No.41206099[source]
to be fair, ".dev" is not a full word, unlike INTERNAL or EXAMPLE. You're free to petition them to reserve .DEVELOPMENT, though, of course.
replies(2): >>41206296 #>>41208751 #
cowsup ◴[] No.41208751[source]
.com is not a full word either (company), or .org (organization), .net (internet), .gov (government), ...
replies(2): >>41208902 #>>41210468 #
TheRealPomax ◴[] No.41210468[source]
.com is literally the opposite of a "reserved to never be used" word though?
replies(1): >>41211295 #
1. saghm ◴[] No.41211295[source]
I'm not sure how that leads to the conclusion that other short, convenient TLDs like `.dev` should just be given to companies like Google to use very sparingly, if at all.

EDIT: Looks like I misunderstood what Google having .dev meant in the above discussion; domains using it are available to purchase through their registrar (or more precisely resellers since I guess they don't sell directly anymore)