←back to thread

203 points jandrewrogers | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.006s | source
Show context
slanderaan01 ◴[] No.41082121[source]
I'm curious what applications there might be if any in number theory. If I recall, langlands had motivations from string theory concepts which ultimately wasn't as successful as hoped in physics.
replies(2): >>41084694 #>>41086092 #
bdjsiqoocwk ◴[] No.41086092[source]
String theory is still the only self consistent theory of quantum physics.... I'd say that's extremely successful.
replies(1): >>41086137 #
defrost ◴[] No.41086137[source]
Not particularly, it's so open ended it describes an enormous landscape of possible universes and lacks any specific testable predictions for our universe.

Unless it's been firmed up a great deal in recent times.

replies(2): >>41086167 #>>41099187 #
1. moomin ◴[] No.41099187{3}[source]
Indeed. Ptolemaic models of planetary movement work fine if you add enough variables.
replies(1): >>41099530 #
2. defrost ◴[] No.41099530[source]
You win two additional epicycles for that comment kind peer.