←back to thread

210 points benbreen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
disillusioned ◴[] No.41084770[source]
My wife found a cool 1896 Harper's School Geography textbook at an antique shop and got it for me, and it had the original pupil's name and signature (and date of 1897!) written on the front matter, but there are also a few other handwritten notes and the name of the school itself... it's such a neat little self-contained time capsule.

It also boggles my mind:

1. How accurate it was, in terms of map fidelity

2. The quality of the illustrations and prints, many of which are in several (what I imagine was offset?) colors!

3. How well it's held up. The cover looks essentially completely trashed, but the interior of the book's pages are almost entirely intact, and in great shape. (I'm not worried of them turning to dust in my hands, for instance.)

It's always fascinating to see just how little has changed, especially among schoolkids in nigh on 300 years!

Here's essentially the exact book I'm talking about, so it's not _that_ uncommon. Looks to be in almost identical condition, too: https://www.ebay.com/itm/184283104558

replies(6): >>41085715 #>>41085842 #>>41086184 #>>41086978 #>>41087282 #>>41089830 #
2OEH8eoCRo0 ◴[] No.41086184[source]
Is it due to a bias on our part that we think that it's fascinating? Why would people be different? People haven't changed, we just have phones now.
replies(1): >>41086433 #
blowski ◴[] No.41086433[source]
> we just have phones now

That’s a huge understatement. We have electricity, refrigeration, medicine, mass transit (including international), human rights, enormous increases in population, fast media, internet, nuclear weapons, universal literacy, factory lines, spaceships, cities of many millions of people. Anyone that’s played Civilisation knows how far the tech tree goes once you hit the Enlightenment.

And you can see how much internet and social media have changed society, so imagine the impact of all those things combined on the human brain.

replies(1): >>41086489 #
2OEH8eoCRo0 ◴[] No.41086489[source]
Right but people, their nature, hasn't changed.
replies(1): >>41086647 #
blowski ◴[] No.41086647[source]
I find this a vague, reductionist view. When I have dinner with my family today, there’s more than one nature, while my own nature has changed in the last 10 years. To say most people have had the same nature at least for the last 300 years is only true if you reduce “nature” to something so banal that it means nothing at all.
replies(3): >>41087466 #>>41087884 #>>41090965 #
1. quonn ◴[] No.41087466[source]
The distribution has not changed. Nobody said that an individual data point is fixed and that all data points are equal.