←back to thread

The New Internet

(tailscale.com)
517 points ingve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
figassis ◴[] No.41083146[source]
I love Tailscale, but this post gives me the creeps. The internet succeeded because it was built on standards and was completely free. With Tailscale, I get wireguard is open source and we have things like Headscale. But the whole everyone gets an IP, doesn’t it depend on Tailscale owning a massive ip address space? We can all wait until full ipv6 rollout, or we can depend on centralized ipv4, and servers and proprietary stuff. Maybe a bit hypocritical?
replies(4): >>41083199 #>>41083232 #>>41084277 #>>41085916 #
jgalt212 ◴[] No.41083232[source]
If you had to move off of tailscale, what would you move to?
replies(5): >>41083267 #>>41083346 #>>41084219 #>>41087337 #>>41090485 #
OJFord ◴[] No.41083267[source]
Zerotier is I think the obvious answer? I haven't used it though; it's more proprietary, not less.
replies(2): >>41083854 #>>41085084 #
viraptor ◴[] No.41085084[source]
Kinda? It works great in practice. You can run your own controllers if you want which completely disconnects you from the proprietary service. But the code is BSL.
replies(1): >>41085605 #
1. OJFord ◴[] No.41085605{3}[source]
I didn't mean to suggest it doesn't work well, as I said I've not used it.

It's still proprietary if you self-host it, I was thinking in particular that tailscale uses Wireguard and Zerotier uses something custom, i.e. proprietary. Note that the context was:

> The internet succeeded because it was built on standards and was completely free. With Tailscale, I get wireguard is open source and we have things like Headscale. But [...]

to which the commenter I replied to asked of alternatives. So I wasn't saying tailscale great and open and standards compliant, and Zerotier not; I was saying it's the obvious competitor but if that's your problem with tailscale then it's if anything worse in that regard.